Future of `Implementation` typedef in `Entity`, `EntityIterator`, elsewhere(?)
We decided to remove the
DUNE_GRID_EXPERIMENTAL_GRID_EXTENSIONS macro by making the
impl() method public and removing
boundaryId() from the public interface at the developer meeting.
We also had some talk about the
Implementation type (for
Entity), but no decision in the end (as far as I remember). Options included:
Implementationand add a
Implementation; users should rely on
For (2.), I would like to add that
Impl is already used for the implementation detail namespaces. Having a type with the same name might be confusing.
The question what to do came up again as part of !164 (merged) which removed the
Implementation type from
EntityIterator and my proposed fix in !166 (closed) (which would implement (1.); I don't mind adding a notice to the typedef as planned for the