#1145 Misprint in dune-common/m4/ax_boost_base.m4 leads to dropping preset LDFLAGS variable
Metadata
| Property | Value | 
|---|---|
| Reported by | Bård Skaflestad (bard.skaflestad@sintef.no) | 
| Reported at | Jul 3, 2012 09:31 | 
| Type | Bug Report | 
| Version | 2.0 | 
| Operating System | Unspecified / All | 
| Last edited by | Christian Engwer (christi@conan.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de) | 
| Last edited at | Jul 6, 2012 11:55 | 
| Closed by | Christian Engwer (christi@conan.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de) | 
| Closed at | Jul 6, 2012 11:55 | 
| Closed in version | Unknown | 
| Resolution | Fixed | 
| Comment | 
Description
The AX_BOOST_BASE macro used by the build system contains a crucial misprint. As far as I can tell, the misprint was introduced in revision 6448 of dune-common/m4/ax_boost_base.m4 . Specifically, that revision renamed several variables including the variable used to preserve the LDFLAGS. Following 6448, any preset LDFLAGS are stored in
ax_boost_base_save_LDFLAGS_SAVEDbut the rest of the macro, including the restoration of original preset LDFLAGS, references
ax_boost_base_save_LDFLAGSwithout the additional "_SAVED" suffix.
This, effectively, means that if the user for any reason assigns LDFLAGS before calling a "configure" script that invokes AX_BOOST_BASE (e.g., the one in dune-istl), then the preset LDFLAGS will be lost.
I have attached a simple (simplistic?) fix relative to dune-common@6817 that removes the "_SAVED" suffix, but there's one caveat. I have not actually tested the result on the computer system where it actually matters in our case.
For reasons I have not been able to track down, processing the DUNE_BOOST_BASE (not AX_BOOST_BASE) macro with Autoconf 2.59 (the default version on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) leads to a race condition whereby the final BOOST_CPPFLAGS end up not including the "-DENABLE_BOOST" flag. This, naturally, leads to no end of grief when using the config.h file in software reliant on Boost (e.g., the ISTL tutorial "example.cc" file in dune-istl/dune/istl/tutorial/example.cc).
Anyway, I hope you'll consider the patch despite lack of testing.