#1633 Use lambdas instead of AnalyticGridFunction
Metadata
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Reported by | Christoph Grüninger (gruenich@iws.uni-stuttgart.de) |
| Reported at | Apr 30, 2015 14:32 |
| Type | Feature Request |
| Version | 2.3 |
| Operating System | Unspecified / All |
| Last edited by | Christoph Grüninger (gruenich@iws.uni-stuttgart.de) |
| Last edited at | May 8, 2015 12:45 |
| Closed by | Christoph Grüninger (gruenich@iws.uni-stuttgart.de) |
| Closed at | May 8, 2015 12:45 |
| Closed in version | Unknown |
| Resolution | Not a bug |
| Comment |
Description
Is there a reason to stick to AnalyticGridFunction to define boundary conditions and properties like permeability/condactivity/persistens/whatever? Wouldn't it be possible to use lambda functions instead? This would reduce the complex and template-prone AnalyticGridFunction stuff and reduce the number of template parameters for several local operators.
With GCC 4.7 as the minimal required compiler this should be usable, shouldn't it?