remove user-defined copy assign/constructor in favour of implicitly-defined ones

marked as a Work In Progress

changed the description

added 1 commit

• 9bc15548 - Added missing return statement

Compare with previous version

unmarked as a Work In Progress

changed the description

Shouldn't we simply remove the method given that apparently nobody used it / needed it? @ansgar , what is your opinion as a user of these index sets?

added 1 commit

• c6c29d07 - Removed user-defined copy assign/constructor in favour of implicitly-defined ones

Compare with previous version

resolved all discussions

changed title from Changed ParallelIndexSet.iterator assignment to overload the right operator to Removed user-defined copy assign/constructor in favour of implicitly-defined ones

changed the description

changed title from Removed user-defined copy assign/constructor in favour of implicitly-defined ones to remove user-defined copy assign/constructor in favour of implicitly-defined ones

merged

mentioned in commit aa4fdb67