#1174 Should jacobianTransposed & Co return a reference or not?
Metadata
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Reported by | Oliver Sander (oliver.sander@tu-dresden.de) |
| Reported at | Aug 30, 2012 15:35 |
| Type | Bug Report |
| Version | 2.2 |
| Operating System | Unspecified / All |
| Last edited by | Martin Nolte (nolte@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de) |
| Last edited at | Feb 17, 2014 17:24 |
| Closed by | Martin Nolte (nolte@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de) |
| Closed at | Feb 17, 2014 17:24 |
| Closed in version | 3.0 |
| Resolution | Implemented |
| Comment | Implemented in 689286f04d783e085861c86dda4974c8ba89f3f4 and 7590013af85fa486119ba376c0dc152a7f191888. Please reopen, if I missed anything. |
Description
This issue has been split off from #955 (closed):
What is the precise return type of the methods jacobianTransposed and JacobianInverseTransposed?
Comment by Martin Nolte (nolte) - Monday, 27 August 2012, 16:18 GMT
(a) Should it be FieldMatrix<...> or FieldMatrix< ... > &, i.e., should, e.g., jacobianTransposed return a reference or not?