Improve testing the UGGrid InteriorBorder_All communication interface
The InteriorBorder_All_Interface
in UGGrid
contained a surprising number of bugs. Let's tighten the test a bit, and fix the bugs.
Edited by Oliver Sander
Merge request reports
Activity
added 1 commit
- dc1dc345 - Merge the testCommunication and EdgeAndFaceCommunication methods
added 1 commit
- e5004847 - Bugfix: InteriorBorder_All_Interface was missing some vertices
added 4 commits
Toggle commit listadded 1 commit
- a6f5549a - UGGrid: Further cleanup of the communication code
added 19 commits
-
23223a6b...5094279f - 10 commits from branch
master
- 1f8667ac - Remove VTK output from test-parallel-ug.cc
- 1c387d0c - Merge the testCommunication and EdgeAndFaceCommunication methods
- 8d1a1b4a - UGGrid: Test communication for all combinations of codimensions
- b2512bd9 - Simplify the UGGridEntity implementation
- 49503c85 - Use the proper UG communication interfaces for InteriorBorder_All_Interface
- 296b4be2 - Simplify the implementation of UGMessageBuffer
- 925fa666 - Bugfix: communicate only on toplevel leaf edge entities
- 964b4304 - UGGrid: Test whether gather/scatter are called correctly
- 6cb1db57 - UGGrid: Further cleanup of the communication code
Toggle commit list-
23223a6b...5094279f - 10 commits from branch
added 21 commits
-
6cb1db57...04da88a3 - 12 commits from branch
master
- ff9e2565 - Remove VTK output from test-parallel-ug.cc
- 255b7f17 - Merge the testCommunication and EdgeAndFaceCommunication methods
- 1dd9c862 - UGGrid: Test communication for all combinations of codimensions
- 10209391 - Simplify the UGGridEntity implementation
- 0760f074 - Use the proper UG communication interfaces for InteriorBorder_All_Interface
- d57be13f - Simplify the implementation of UGMessageBuffer
- ae3958bf - Bugfix: communicate only on toplevel leaf edge entities
- d8b650c9 - UGGrid: Test whether gather/scatter are called correctly
- 5b55a896 - UGGrid: Further cleanup of the communication code
Toggle commit list-
6cb1db57...04da88a3 - 12 commits from branch
mentioned in commit 8418569e
mentioned in merge request !437 (closed)
mentioned in merge request !438 (merged)
Please register or sign in to reply