Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jan 18, 2024
  2. Jan 17, 2024
  3. Nov 20, 2023
  4. Oct 12, 2023
  5. Oct 10, 2023
  6. Oct 09, 2023
  7. Oct 08, 2023
  8. Sep 20, 2023
  9. Sep 19, 2023
  10. Jun 21, 2023
  11. May 25, 2023
  12. Apr 11, 2023
    • Carsten Gräser's avatar
    • Andreas Dedner's avatar
    • Carsten Gräser's avatar
      Switch to std::uint_least32_t for stored indices in MatrixIndexSet · 4886d18b
      Carsten Gräser authored
      Using `std::uint_least32_t` instead of `std::size_t` halves the required memory
      and thus also improves performance.
      Notice that `std::uint32_t` is optional and `std::uint_fast32_t` is intended to be
      fast in terms of computations and may have 64 bits. Here we're interested in reducing
      memory and thus bandwith. Hence `std::uint_least32_t`, which is the smallest sufficient
      type is most appropriate.
      4886d18b
    • Carsten Gräser's avatar
      Switch internal data structure in MatrixIndexSet · c8272a07
      Carsten Gräser authored
      This replaces the `std::set` used to store the column indices for each
      rows by a `std::vector` based implementation. The `std::vector` is
      kept sorted when inserting such that we can avoid duplicates. This
      can improve assembly time of matrices significantly (if `MatrixIndexSet` is used).
      
      In the worst case (insertion in reverse) this may lead to O(n^2) complexity
      when inserting n entries in a row compared to O(n log(n)) for `std::set`.
      However, the sorted `std::vector` implementation still wins for relatively
      large n. To avoid the worst case complexity when using very dense rows,
      the implementation is switched to `std::set` if the size exceeds the threshold
      value `maxVectorSize`. The default `maxVectorSize=2048` was selected based
      on benchmark results.
      c8272a07
  13. Apr 04, 2023
  14. Mar 16, 2023
  15. Mar 07, 2023
  16. Feb 12, 2023
  17. Feb 06, 2023
  18. Jan 16, 2023
    • Carsten Gräser's avatar
      [bugfix] Add missing specialization FieldTraits<MultiTypeBlockMatrix> · fe3dccab
      Carsten Gräser authored
      Notice that this also fixes an incorrect `MultiTypeBlockMatrix::field_type`
      in a special setting: If you have a nested matrix
      `MultiTypeBlockMatrix< MultiTypeBlockVector<MultiTypeBlockMatrix<...>>>`,
      the outer `MultiTypeBlockMatrix::field_type` forwards to the `MultiTypeBlockVector::field_type`
      which forwards to the inner `FieldTraits<MultiTypeBlockMatrix>::field_type`.
      fe3dccab
  19. Jan 09, 2023
  20. Jan 08, 2023
  21. Jan 07, 2023
  22. Dec 12, 2022
  23. Dec 08, 2022
Loading