Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Dec 16, 2024
  2. Dec 15, 2024
  3. Dec 14, 2024
  4. Dec 13, 2024
  5. Dec 12, 2024
  6. Dec 11, 2024
  7. Dec 10, 2024
  8. Dec 04, 2024
  9. Dec 03, 2024
  10. Dec 02, 2024
    • Carsten Gräser's avatar
      [ci] Make .gitlab-ci.yml portable · 70bcdbdf
      Carsten Gräser authored
      Currently the CI config requires that the `core/ci-config`
      project exists on the same gitlab server. This prevents
      the CI from working when pushing the repository to another
      server. While one may argue, that one also has to push
      `core/ci-config` then, it is a very strong restriction to
      require that the gitlab group `core` is available.
      
      This can be avoided by using a gitlab remote include for those
      files with a link pointing to the dune server instead of a local
      include.
      70bcdbdf
  11. Nov 29, 2024
  12. Nov 28, 2024
  13. Nov 26, 2024
  14. Nov 25, 2024
  15. Nov 22, 2024
    • Carsten Gräser's avatar
      Merge branch 'bugfix/fix-greedy-streamoperators' into 'master' · 56b4aa26
      Carsten Gräser authored
      [bugfix] Don't implent operator<< templated wrt the stream
      
      See merge request !1476
      56b4aa26
    • Carsten Gräser's avatar
      [bugfix] Don't provide operator<< templated for the stream · dd5cc8be
      Carsten Gräser authored
      When implementing `operator<<(S& , const T&)` to provide character
      stream support for a custom type `T`, the overload should be specific
      to `S=std::ostream` and not be templated wrt `S`. Otherwise this may
      lead to ambiguous overloads downstream.
      To give two examples for problematic cases:
      
      Here we defined an overload
      ```cpp
      template<class Stream, class T, std::size_t N>
      inline Stream& operator<<(Stream&, const std::array<T,N>&)
      ```
      If a downstream module wants to defines an overload
      ```cpp
      template<class A>
      inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const A&)
      ```
      for a custom type `A` derived from `std::array<T,N>`,
      this leads to ambiguity.
      
      If a custom class `S` that does not represent a character stream
      wants to use the `s << t` syntax in anoter context, this cannot
      be done for cases where `t` is an `std::array`. Furtermore
      the overload that we provide here may in general not make any
      sense in this context.
      
      BTW: One may argue that defining overloads for `std::` types
      is in general a very bad idea. Imagine that another library
      does the same - then we cannot use it together with dune, because
      both claim to be the authority over `std::`.
      dd5cc8be
  16. Nov 19, 2024
  17. Nov 16, 2024
  18. Nov 15, 2024
  19. Nov 11, 2024
Loading